Skip to main content

All side-scrolling games are basically the same... and that’s okay



With the recent announcement of Mega Man 11, I’ve been thinking about side scrolling games and how despite the simplicity of their design they have stood the test of time. How is it possible that the simple gameplay of moving in a 2D space from point A to point B could possible tell an engaging story let alone provide for hours of single player gameplay that have fans begging for more? Being a fan of Super Mario Bros. as a kid I decided to rekindle that childhood gaming fire of mine by downloading every side-scrolling Mega Man, Mario, Metroid and whatever else that I could find (onto my jail broken PSP of course), and see what people think is so great about them. The conclusion that I have come to is that these games are all pretty much the same. Timing your jumps right to make it across platforms, while also dodging enemies and whatever projectiles they throw at you, while occasionally taking a detour to try and snag a golden coin (or whatever collectible the game has to offer) that’s near impossible to get to, is the basic premise of these games. Even the mechanics of the boss fights didn’t differ much. Dodge a few attacks that usually come in a predictable pattern, hit the boss, rinse and repeat
All that being said, I still could not get enough of them. There is somewhat of an addicting quality to their gameplay. Platforms being placed in just the right places, enemies movement coordinated in just the right way to frustrate players. Playing a level over and over again, getting closer and closer each time to the end goal. Every time you die you think to yourself “Wow, I totally could have made that jump that time” so you keep trying and trying until you finally make it. While I never found myself fully engaged in any of the stories I can truly say that the creativity in a good side scroller does not come from its story, but from the complexity of its level design.
Single player games often struggle with good level design. Having only a few control options in a side scrolling game (usually move left, right, jump and shoot), developers have to be even more creative when creating levels and that is typically where these games shine. And even though gameplay was basically the same from game to game, having a laser sword while playing as Zero in Mega Man or being able to shoot aliens as Samus in Metroid added just enough variety for me to fell like I was playing something different. I can even say that I enjoyed the different art styles that each game had to offer. I even find myself watching speed running competitions where gamers compete to beat side-scrolling games, that would take normal people around a week, in just a couple of hours. It would seem that side-scrolling games aren’t going anywhere anytime soon, and with the recent trend of hd remakes it’s only a matter of time we see our beloved side-scrollers redone in this fashion.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GTX 1060 and 1070 aren't dead. And welcome the new GTX 1070 ti.

Ah, the GTX 1080 ti. The mac-daddy of graphic cards to date. It's capable of fluid 4k gameplay with impressive resolutions at a premium price, ranging from $750 to $850. It really is on another level as far as graphic cards go. Enthusiasts will surely plug one of these into their setups for some ultra setting gameplay. For the rest of us there's the rest of the GTX family. If you need a card that can handle the games at a 60+ frame rate at 1080p or 1440p without breaking the bank, then turn your attention to the GTX 1060, 1070, or the soon to release 1070 ti. These cards are still pumping out fps on today's releases. Check out toptengamers.com GTX 1080 vs 1070 vs 1060  benchmark data. With the release of the 1070 ti we have another high end card for a mid-range price, starting at $449. It's just shy of the 1080 in CUDA cores count at 2,432 versus 2,560 in the 1080 but uses GDDR5 instead of GDDR5X. The best time may be now, to join the GTX 10XX family if yo...

What will Call of Duty fans want after WWII?

I can still remember back in 2007 when Infinity Ward’s Call of Duty Modern Warfare was released. People were going crazy over this game that arguably set the standard for how a multiplayer FPS game should be played (settle down Halo fans, I said “arguably”). Modern Warfare was really the first mainstream, multiplayer FPS to be set in a modern war setting, dealing with modern military weapons and real life special forces teams battling terrorists. It was definitely a relief from the old World War II setting that most military FPS’s were set in before this time. So when Treyarch decided to go back in time again to WWII for their turn at a Call of Duty game, it should be no surprise that Call of Duty World at War was met with some disappointment from fans. If it wasn’t for the now industry standard Zombie mode World at War would not have been met with such positive reviews. It seemed fans were more satisfied with the modern setting, but some eager fans called for something more. I...