Skip to main content

What will Call of Duty fans want after WWII?

I can still remember back in 2007 when Infinity Ward’s Call of Duty Modern Warfare was released. People were going crazy over this game that arguably set the standard for how a multiplayer FPS game should be played (settle down Halo fans, I said “arguably”). Modern Warfare was really the first mainstream, multiplayer FPS to be set in a modern war setting, dealing with modern military weapons and real life special forces teams battling terrorists. It was definitely a relief from the old World War II setting that most military FPS’s were set in before this time. So when Treyarch decided to go back in time again to WWII for their turn at a Call of Duty game, it should be no surprise that Call of Duty World at War was met with some disappointment from fans. If it wasn’t for the now industry standard Zombie mode World at War would not have been met with such positive reviews. It seemed fans were more satisfied with the modern setting, but some eager fans called for something more. I'll admit I even got a little hyped from the rumors spreading, YouTube videos, and article posted, teasing a Call of Duty Future Warfare featuring laser guns and spaceships. (Seriously, YouTube Call of Duty Future Warfare, scroll all the way down, and you will see what some fans legitimately wanted)

Just a sample of the videos being made back in 2008-09

Fast forward 10 years later and futuristic warfare is all we’ve seen since Modern Warfare 3 and fans are understandably tired of it. I mean how much more futuristic could you get before the franchise becomes a copy of Halo. So what’s the logical next step for this franchise? Well why not go back to the time period that fans didn’t appreciate in the first place. Don’t get me wrong, I like the fact that Sledgehammer Games isn’t afraid to do something different with the franchise, but my question is what will fans want next? They could always pull a Battlefield and go back to World War I, which by the way is my favorite Battlefield game, but that setting doesn’t seem to fit the much faster paced gameplay of Call of Duty. It seems to me that this franchise is running out of steam, but seeing as how Activision is not about to let one of its yearly revenue streams run dry, is it time we see something way out of the box like Call of Duty Civil War. It’s highly unlikely but my point is, for this series to keep my interest it’s time to see some innovation.

Call of Duty: WWII releases November 3, 2017


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is GameStop Shifting Their Focus Away From Games?

If you’ve been to your local GameStop lately you might have noticed something different about the way they have been displaying their merchandise. Walls that used to be lined with used games from last generations consoles have been replaced with Pop figures of popular comic book and TV series character, replica props from video games, and t-shirts sporting this years pop culture icons. I was a little disappointed to see my beloved Xbox 360 games reduced to a tiny shelf in the middle of the store, but I can also understand the shift in merchandise focus. I would imagine that it is not just used game sales that are suffering. New games have to be taking a hit as well. With the ease of downloadable video games it is easy to see that physical disc copy sales would suffer. For the hardcore online gamer it’s much easier to pre-order a game online, pre-download it to your hard drive, and start gaming as soon as the servers go live at midnight. Not to mention that having a bunch of discs ...
Post a Comment
Read more

GTX 1060 and 1070 aren't dead. And welcome the new GTX 1070 ti.

Ah, the GTX 1080 ti. The mac-daddy of graphic cards to date. It's capable of fluid 4k gameplay with impressive resolutions at a premium price, ranging from $750 to $850. It really is on another level as far as graphic cards go. Enthusiasts will surely plug one of these into their setups for some ultra setting gameplay. For the rest of us there's the rest of the GTX family. If you need a card that can handle the games at a 60+ frame rate at 1080p or 1440p without breaking the bank, then turn your attention to the GTX 1060, 1070, or the soon to release 1070 ti. These cards are still pumping out fps on today's releases. Check out toptengamers.com GTX 1080 vs 1070 vs 1060  benchmark data. With the release of the 1070 ti we have another high end card for a mid-range price, starting at $449. It's just shy of the 1080 in CUDA cores count at 2,432 versus 2,560 in the 1080 but uses GDDR5 instead of GDDR5X. The best time may be now, to join the GTX 10XX family if yo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Are Micro transactions necessary for the future of gaming?

Micro transactions have been a huge topic in gaming lately. Whether you are paying for the best weapons and armor in the game, cosmetic items, loot boxes, double xp, and more, if something can be downloaded too a game the developers are selling it. A lot of gamers are furious at this new standard in the gaming industry, but do they have any right to be angry?  I mean these are gamers that have been paying $60 for a game since the PS3 and Xbox 360 days, and back in those days items were unlocked rather than bought. At least that is what other gamers are saying that don’t quite understand the situation. The fact is that video games are getting better and better each year. Graphics are more detailed, open world maps are expanding, and online multiplayer content is improving, but one thing about new games hasn’t changed, and that is the price. It has been over 10 years since the release of last generations consoles yet despite games improving in every way the price remains constant. ...
Post a Comment
Read more